Tariffs spook markets
President Trump has announced a 25% tariff on imports from Canada and Mexico to start tomorrow. Imports from China will face a 10% levy.
25% is punitive. It’s hard to imagine Trump intends this to remain the status quo; we will have to wait and see what happens next. Meanwhile the much more reasonable 10% global tariff has yet to be implemented.
Wall Street media however have mounted a propaganda campaign insinuating that tariffs are categorically intrinsically harmful. That is too easy … what tax isn’t harmful? Yet the same media are apologists for most harmful tax of all, the inflation tax, rarely if ever finding any fault with inflationary monetary policy.
Let’s take a closer look at the sophistry emerging from Wall Street economists. They claim that tariffs are inflationary, that they will cause the prices of goods and services to rise. It’s not a given … corporate profits are historically high and much of the cost could come from there. But let’s assume for the moment that that claim is accurate.
Suppose a tariff results in an increase in goods and services prices of 2%. All else being equal, that reduces consumers’ purchasing power by about 2%.
Compare that with an increase in the income tax by the same amount. Doesn’t this also reduce consumers’ purchasing power by the same amount?
Yet tariffs are singled out as uniquely costly to the economy. I will leave it to the reader to assess today’s market action and form an opinion as to why Wall Street economists might assume such a bias.
In each case, all else being equal, the purchasing power consumers have lost has been transferred to the federal government. But suppose that among all those elses being equal, federal spending remains the same as well. The funds collected from tariffs, or the income tax as the case may be, then must reduce the federal deficit. Since deficits are funded by inflation, this then must mean that the inflation tax is reduced by a like amount. In which case there is no loss to consumers’ purchasing power at all.
The only difference between collecting a tariff, assessing an income tax, and deficit spending is the means through which citizens’ purchasing power is taken and the incentive structure that goes with it. The amount taken is determined by federal spending.
Don’t expect Wall Street economists to explain that.
On another Track, Rubio sez the Unipolar era is OVER!
As i said to some ex Itulip people i used to work in the British Home office. I can’t talk much about my job but i was part of security complex…….my job gave me contact with “other departs”……….
when biden pulled out of Afghanistan the FURY of the British establishment was stunning!
Everyone in the loop right down to the BBC was PISSED!
THe British have NEVER got over the fact that the are no longer a “Great power”. They tried to “Steer” American overseas policy to suit them & rode around on America’s coat tails……..with Biden NOT discussing the pull out with them in advance marked a new “relationship”.
Interesting times ahead
interesting point of view
https://x.com/Megatron_ron/status/1885470723218591838?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
Note how the establishment British hack gets caught flat footed. America is changing its overseas policy.
Mike
Canada has said it will target its taxes at ROP states……………..Trump sez ok, i take the tax to 50%!
Mike