To Be A Millionaire

It’s all in your head

An article recently appeared on MSN Moneywise looking into the question of why so many millionaires don’t feel rich:

A nation of miserable millionaires: Two-thirds of Americans with more than $1M in the bank say they don’t ‘feel rich.’ Is wealth really subjective?

The article dismisses it as psychology. Rich is a state of mind. It’s all in your head.

I, Finster, beg to disagree.

A million bucks just ain’t what it used to be. Inflation has eroded the value of a million dollars just the same as it has a single dollar. A hour of the time of a skilled tradesman, for example a plumber, electrician, carpenter or mason, typically once ran about ten dollars. Now it’s about a hundred or more. A luxury car used to be ten thousand, now it’s a hundred. A million used to be enough to buy multiple homes, now in many locales it doesn’t even buy one. According to the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, $100 in 2025 has the same purchasing power as just $12.05 did in 1970 … … and that’s based on watered down government inflation statistics. As recently as 2009, a million dollars could buy 1500 units of the S&P 500. Now it buys less than 150. In 1968, it could buy 28,571 troy ounces of gold. Now it doesn’t even buy 250.

The gold, meanwhile, buys just as much as it did a century ago. If you were a millionaire in gold in 1925, and had the same amount of gold today, you still feel as rich as you did then.

American Life: Less Ordinary

It’s not all in your head. The dollar has lost so much value, you now have to be a millionaire just to aspire to the middle class.

3 thoughts on “To Be A Millionaire

    1. Finster says:

      In general, sure. On the inflation front, not so much. A hundred years ago a millionaire was truly rich. Even by government inflation statistics, $1M in 1925 was the equivalent of $38.6M in 2025. In terms of gold, more like $200M (gold was $20.67 an ounce). I don’t have any 1925 survey data, but am pretty confident if you asked, few millionaires would say they didn’t feel rich.

      For average Americans, sixty years would be a less flattering comparison. Living standards have been flat to down. Sure, we have snazzier toys, but in the sixties, it was normal for a couple to own a home, a car, and raise a family, on just one income. Both have to work today for similar material returns. When people have to work twice as many hours for the same stuff, that’s a 50% haircut in living standards.

      Things turned down in the seventies, but recovered in the eighties and nineties. By 2000 living standards were good. Most of the stuff of the sixties but with better tech. The federal budget was nearly balanced. Since then though it’s been all downhill. In 2000, a million could buy the “American Dream”, but today it takes five:

      The 2025 “American Dream” Now Costs More Than $5 Million

      I like to distinguish between the effects of technology and of government. No question technology has greatly improved living standards, but government, with its wars, meddling, regulation and inflation, has done the opposite.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *